Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Weidenmoyer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1988No. 158 and 160 E.D. Appeal Docket 1986PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

Appellees Robert H. Weidenmoyer and Deborah Jo Carter were convicted of violations of the Controlled Substance Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act1 and of criminal conspiracy.2 Weidenmoyer was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of one and one-half to five years, and Carter to a term of two to twenty-three months. The Superior Court reversed the sentences and relinquished jurisdiction. 350 Pa.Super. 630, 503 A.2d 454. The Commonwealth sought review of that decision in this Court, and we granted allocatur to address the question of whether the search warrant executed by…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Commonwealth v. LyonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. BingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. DunlapSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API