Padilla v. Yoo
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Now before the Court is the motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted filed by Defendant John Yoo (“Yoo”). Having carefully reviewed the parties’ papers and considered the relevant legal authority, and having had the benefit of oral argument, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby DENIES IN PART and GRANTS IN PART Yoo’s motion to dismiss.
[War] will compel nations the most attached to…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jose Padilla v. John YooCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Morales v. City of DelanoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Tanvir v. LynchDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Vance v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Lebron v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.