Legal Opinion

Lebron v. Rumsfeld

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided February 17, 2011No. Case 2:07-410-RMGPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RICHARD MARK GERGEL, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims, asserting, inter alia, that no valid cause of action exists in this matter under the principles of Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) and its progeny and that they are entitled to qualified immunity regarding all claims asserted in the Third Amended Complaint. Defendant Gates, sued in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, further asserts that Plaintiffs have no standing to…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lebron Ex Rel. Padilla v. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  2. Jose Padilla v. John YooCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Doe v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Doe v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Jose Padilla v. John YooCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API