Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Safie Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The claimant contends that by reason of the inequitable conduct of the defendant-employer, the defendants should be held to be estopped from setting up the defense that his claim was filed too late; that such conduct was responsible for the delay of more than one year in filing his claim.

It must be conceded that unless the doctrine of equitable estoppel can be invoked by the claimant in this proceeding, he is not entitled to recover.

The evidence tends to show that claimant sent two or three messages to the Superintendent of the Safie Manufacturing Company, requesting him to come to see him,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Fox v. Cramerton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Winslow v. . Carolina Conference AssociationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Hegler v. Cannon Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Whitted v. . Palmer-Bee Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Biddix v. Rex Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Mabe v. North Carolina Granite CorporationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Gregory v. W.A. Brown & SonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Gantt v. Edmos Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Biddix v. Rex Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API