Harlan v. Aetna Life Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
As the result of an automobile collision on April 16, 1966, the lens and iris of Mr. Harlan’s left eye were severely damaged. At the time of the injury, he was insured by Aetna Life Insurance Company under a group policy which provided a benefit for “the entire and irrecov erable loss of sight” in an eye as a direct and proximate result of and within 90 days of an accidental injury.
Surgery was performed immediately, but Mr. Harlan lost 60 per cent of the iris and all useful portions of the lens of his eye. After surgery, because his uncorrected left eye vision was no better than 20/400, he…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. Continental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Omeitt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. LemieuxWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Kearney v. Washington National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- State v. HuffWashington Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Buchanan v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- James F. Rice v. Military Sales & Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Cotton v. Provident Life &Casualty Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Washington State University v. Industrial Rock Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Continental Casualty Co. v. WoodwardDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003