Legal Opinion

Morse Diesel International, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 1, 2006No. Nos. 99-279C, 99-529C, 99-530C, 00-531C, 03-1537CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING THE GOVERNMENT’S SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 MOTION TO TRANSFER AND CONSOLIDATE AND PLAINTIFF’S JANUARY 9, 2006 MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

BRADEN, Judge.

RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND

A complete statement of the factual background relevant to this Memorandum Opinion is set forth in Morse Diesel Int’l, Inc. v. United States, 66 Fed.Cl. 788, 789-93 (Fed. C1.2005) (“Morse Diesel F). In brief, Morse Diesel International, Inc. (“MDI”)1 is a construction management firm that contracted for work on three United States federal buildings that are now the subject of lawsuits filed in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alliant Techsystems, Inc., Global Environmental Solutions Business Division v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  2. Joseph Morton Co., Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. The United States, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Frantz Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  4. Giuliani Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  5. Morse Diesel International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morse Diesel International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Morse Diesel International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Johnson Lasky Kindelin Architects, Inc v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API