Legal Opinion

Giuliani Contracting Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 26, 1990No. 90-214-CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RADER, Judge.

Plaintiff, Guiliani Contracting Company, contracted with the Department of the Army (the Army) to replace sanitary sewers at West Point Military Academy. During performance, plaintiff claimed delay damages. The Contracting Officer (CO) *82rejected the claims. Plaintiff subsequently filed a complaint with the United States Claims Court. Defendant moved under the Contract Disputes Act to transfer this action to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA or Board) where two claims on the same contract are now pending.

Due to the clarity of law and facts in the written…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. E.D.S. Federal Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  2. Roubin & Janeiro, Inc.United States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Space Age Engineering, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. David J. Tierney, Jr., Inc.United States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Blount, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. BRC Lease Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Marshall Associated Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  4. Morse Diesel International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API