Legal Opinion

Morse Diesel International, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 7, 2008No. 99-279CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*221 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BRADEN, Judge.

I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY.

On October 31, 2007, the court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order granting the Government’s May 18, 2007 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and awarding the Government $259,457.04, under the Anti-Kickback Act, and $7,022,666, under the False Claims Act, for a total of $7,282,123. See Morse Diesel Int’l, Inc. v. United States, 79 Fed.Cl. 116, 129 (2007).1 On November 14, 2007, Plaintiff filed a Motion For Spoliation Sanctions (“Pl.Mot.”), together with a Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Residential Funding Corporation v. Degeorge Financial Corp., Degeorge Home Alliance, Inc. And Degeorge Capital CorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. Eric Esher Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Eric SchmidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Praxair Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Navedo v. Nalco Chemical, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
  4. GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, DefendantUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Chapman Law Firm, LPA v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API