Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Commissioner of Civil Service

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 28, 1932PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a petition for writ of mandamus. The case was referred to an auditor. It was then heard on the pleadings and the auditor’s report. The facts were found to be as stated in the auditor’s report and it was ordered that the petition be dismissed as matter of law. The case was then reported to this court for determination. The material facts are these: The police department of the city of Pittsfield is subject to the civil service laws and to valid rules and regulations of the civil service commissioners. The petitioner was appointed to the police department of Pittsfield in 1913 and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Watts v. WattsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. Bois v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Fernandez v. Mayor of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Goldberg v. Commissioner of Civil ServiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Police Commissioner v. Commissioner of Civil ServiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Horrigan v. Mayor of PittsfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. Cullen v. Mayor of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Chartrand v. Registrar of Motor VehiclesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  4. Ryan v. City of MarlboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  5. Commissioner of Labor & Industries v. DowneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API