Legal Opinion

Fernandez v. Mayor of New Bedford

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 30, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus, brought by one who was enrolled in the classified list of the public service of this Commonwealth. He was duly certified, regularly appointed and permanently employed as a tree climber in the forestry department of the city of New Bed-ford. He sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment on November 10, 1922, and, under the *446provisions of G. L. c. 152, § 69, received compensation from the city of New Bedford until September 8, 1928. These payments amounted to the maximum sum of $4,000 payable for total disability. Prior to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. TrehyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Skold v. Chief of the Fire DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Feehan v. Chief Engineer of the Fire DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Horrigan v. Mayor of PittsfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  2. McCarthy v. City of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Dunn v. Commissioner of Civil ServiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Olivier v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Smith v. Director of the Department of Public SafetyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API