Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Labor & Industries v. Downey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 29, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This petition for a writ of mandamus is brought to enforce the provisions of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 41, § 111, as amended by St. 1932, c. 109. The duty to enforce that statute is cast upon the petitioner. The provisions of that section, so far as here material, are- in these words: “In any city which accepted said chapter the city council may determine that a vacation of two weeks without loss *433of pay shall be granted to every person regularly employed by such city as a common laborer, skilled laborer, mechanic or craftsman. If such vacations are authorized, they shall be granted by the heads of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bois v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Boody v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. McCabe v. Judge of the District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. Dunn v. Commissioner of Civil ServiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Downey v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Barnard v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Board of Selectmen v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Myers v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Mayor of Newton v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API