Commissioner of Labor & Industries v. Downey
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This petition for a writ of mandamus is brought to enforce the provisions of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 41, § 111, as amended by St. 1932, c. 109. The duty to enforce that statute is cast upon the petitioner. The provisions of that section, so far as here material, are- in these words: “In any city which accepted said chapter the city council may determine that a vacation of two weeks without loss *433of pay shall be granted to every person regularly employed by such city as a common laborer, skilled laborer, mechanic or craftsman. If such vacations are authorized, they shall be granted by the heads of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bois v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Boody v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- McCabe v. Judge of the District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Dunn v. Commissioner of Civil ServiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
3Cited by8 opinions
- Downey v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Barnard v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Board of Selectmen v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Myers v. City of OakdaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Mayor of Newton v. Civil Service CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.