State v. Lenkart
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION *
Justice NEHRING,
opinion of the Court:
INTRODUCTION
{ 1 Jeffery Lenkart was charged with rape, forcible sodomy, and two counts of forcible sexual abuse. A jury convicted him on all counts, and he was sentenced to concurrent prison terms. Following his sentencing hearing, Mr. Lenkart moved to arrest judgment and filed a motion for a new trial, which the trial court denied. On appeal, Mr. Len-kart argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for a new trial. Mr. Len-kart first argues that his trial counsel was ineffective. Mr. Lenkart also claims that the trial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. TemplinUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Ronald R. Harries, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. HoustonUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. McNeilUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Menzies v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. LarrabeeUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. HutchingsUtah Supreme Court · 2012
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.