Legal Opinion

State v. Lenkart

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2011No. 20090369PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION *

Justice NEHRING,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

{ 1 Jeffery Lenkart was charged with rape, forcible sodomy, and two counts of forcible sexual abuse. A jury convicted him on all counts, and he was sentenced to concurrent prison terms. Following his sentencing hearing, Mr. Lenkart moved to arrest judgment and filed a motion for a new trial, which the trial court denied. On appeal, Mr. Len-kart argues that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for a new trial. Mr. Len-kart first argues that his trial counsel was ineffective. Mr. Lenkart also claims that the trial…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. TemplinUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Ronald R. Harries, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. HoustonUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. McNeilUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Menzies v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. LarrabeeUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. HutchingsUtah Supreme Court · 2012

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API