Legal Opinion
Leventhal v. Schenberg
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided January 17, 2013No. 11 C 4614PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES F. HOLDERMAN, Chief Judge:
In his Second Amended Complaint, plaintiff Howard Leventhal (“Leventhal”) alleges that defendants Gene Byron Schenberg (“Schenberg”), Richard F. Huck, III (“Huck”); Michael J. McKitrick (“McKitrick”), and Danna McKitrick PC (“Danna McKitrick”) are liable for malicious prosecution (First Cause of Action) and abuse of process (Second Cause of Action); that *840Schenberg is liable for copyright infringement (Third Cause of Action); that defendants NetSecure Technologies, Inc. (“NetSecure”) and Daniel McCann (“McCann”) are liable for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Champion Laboratories, Inc. v. Central Illinois Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- In re MeltzerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Panoramic Stock Images, Ltd. v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Panoramic Stock Images, Ltd. v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- David Choate Hughes II v. Mitchell Mims, MIMS-IPR, LLC, Jackson Neal, Curtis H. Seal, Blake Milner, and Emily Grace ErwinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.