Legal Opinion
Lanzo v. F & D MOTOR WORKS
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 25, 1986No. C1-86-960PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
This is an appeal by F & D Motor Works (F & D) from an unlawful detainer judgment in Hennepin County Municipal Court granting a writ of restitution to respondents John and Barbara Lanzo (Lanzos). The court ruled that F & D was wrongfully holding over after receiving notice to vacate the premises. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant F & D has leased the property at 5371 Minnehaha Avenue South, Minneapolis, from respondents Lanzos as an automobile repair shop on an oral, month-to-month lease since July 15, 1981. On September 30, 1985, the Lanzos entered into a purchase agreement with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- William Weisman Holding Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Dahlberg v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Gallagher v. MoffetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Weise v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Adamek v. Plano Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Real Estate Equity Strategies, LLC v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. ObermollerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Unity Investors Ltd. Partnership v. LindbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988