Legal Opinion
Adamek v. Plano Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 30, 1896No. Nos. 9986-(207)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Renville county, Webber, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
Action to recover the value of certain personal property, which plaintiff alleges was converted by the defendant. There was a trial of the action in the district court at Olivia, the county seat of Renville county, in the month of April, 1895, and a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff; but, on account of an erroneous ruling of the trial judge, he set aside the verdict, and granted a new trial, on motion of the defendant.
The cause being upon the calendar of the general term of the district court commencing October 22, 1895, the defendant made application to the court to postpone the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brock v. South & North. Ala. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pierce v. EngelkemeierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Josephson v. SigfussonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Lanzo v. F & D MOTOR WORKSCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Luman v. HillWyoming Supreme Court · 1927