Legal Opinion

Little v. Emmett Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1928No. Nos. 5013, 5016PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

Defendant’s two appeals from judgments, consolidated for all purposes here, involve actions upon warrants issued by the district. One complaint, involving warrants issued between August 11, 1913, and September 30, 1914, was filed May 25, 1925; the other, involving warrants all issued February 21, 1914, was filed June 15, 1923.

Appellant contends (1) that the actions were barred by C. S., secs. 6609, 6610 and 6617, and (2) that the remedy of plaintiffs, if any, was by application for mandamus, and not by action for money judgment.

The court found that the defendant owned, and was operating and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Lincoln County v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Barnes v. GlideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. City of Sulphur v. State Ex Rel. Lankford, Bank Com'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Potter v. City of New WhatcomWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Freehill v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ralphs v. City of Spirit LakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Simons v. SimonsIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Irvine v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. Clark v. BaileyMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Board of Education of Duncan v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API