Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Mauney

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1963No. 168PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Carolina assigns as error tee court’® refusal to. allow its motion for nonsuit.

Plaintiff alleges he was injured when Mauney, traveling at a high speed, negligently left the channel and entered a .shallow cove. The •boat grounded, pitching plaintiff into the windshield.

Plaintiff neither alleges nor offered evidence tending to- show tee grounding was due to a defect -in tee boat or to Mauney’® incompetence. The negligence alleged iis Mauney’s failure to utilize tee knowledge and skill he possessed. Carolina was not liable for plaintiff’s injuries merely because it owned the vessel in which…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Linville v. . NissenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. United States v. EleazerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  3. Travis v. DuckworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Parrott v. . KantorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Parrott v. KantorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. King v. GrindstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. King v. AllredSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Jerry Frazier, a Minor, by His Next Friend, T. L. Frazier, and T. L. Frazier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  4. Thomas v. PooleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Sharpe v. GrindstaffDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API