Legal Opinion

Tankel v. Union Central Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 10, 1936No. 30,759PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Plaintiff brought this suit to set aside a foreclosure by advertisement, the basis for the attack being that the notice of foreclosure was published only four times instead of the six publications required under 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 9604.

Defendant answered. setting up the following facts by way of confession and avoidance: On March 1, 1929, the then record owners of the premises involved executed a note secured by real estate mortgage upon said premises in the amount of $6,500. That note and mortgage were later acquired by defendant. In 1933 there was default, and defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White v. MazalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hess v. KoskovitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Orfield v. MorstainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Twenty Associates, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API