Tankel v. Union Central Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Plaintiff brought this suit to set aside a foreclosure by advertisement, the basis for the attack being that the notice of foreclosure was published only four times instead of the six publications required under 2 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 9604.
Defendant answered. setting up the following facts by way of confession and avoidance: On March 1, 1929, the then record owners of the premises involved executed a note secured by real estate mortgage upon said premises in the amount of $6,500. That note and mortgage were later acquired by defendant. In 1933 there was default, and defendant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- White v. MazalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hess v. KoskovitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Orfield v. MorstainSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Twenty Associates, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937