Legal Opinion

White v. Mazal

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 16, 1934No. 29,983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JULIUS J. OLSON, Justice.

Defendant has appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial. After appeal to this court, plaintiff, Johanna C. White, died, and William Cornelius White and others were, on motion duly made in their behalf, substituted as plaintiffs. In this opinion we shall refer to the parties as if no such substitution had been made.

The cause was tried to the court and findings were made upholding plaintiff’s claim, to the effect that a certain foreclosure by advertisement of a real estate mortgage was fatally defective. Decision on the merits hinges upon the question of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pratt v. TinkcomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Erickson v. MathwigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Linneman v. SwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Tankel v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Supornick v. National Retailers Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Gallaher v. TitlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API