Carhart v. Mackle
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from city court of Atlanta—Judge Reid, October 20, 1917.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
Carbart brought suit against Mackle and McAuley. The petition as amended contained two counts. We quote enough only of each to show their character. The first count charges that the defendants, “without probable cause and with, malice . . , procured to be issued from. the municipal court of Atlanta a warrant charging the petitioner with the crime of larceny after trust, “upon which petitioner was arrested and deprived of his liberty and required to give bond for his appear*521anee to answer said heinous offense.” The second count charges that “on Sunday, the 24th day of September, 1916, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cosfriff Bros. v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
- Ross v. MercerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Fugazzi, Lovelace & Co. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Zorn v. LamarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- McElroy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Seals v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Stein v. LazarusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Floyd v. Massachusetts MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Spell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Henderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.