Zorn v. Lamar
Supreme Court of Georgia
Practice in Supreme Court. At September Term, 1883. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Jackson, Chief Justice.
A motion was made to dismiss this writ of error, on the ground that the plaintiffs in error consented to the final judgment which disposed of the case below, and thereby gave this court jurisdiction to review it. “ Consensus tollit errorem ” is a maxim as old as the civil law, and it has been applied to the common law from the times whereof the memory of man runneth not to the contrary; especially to causes brought by writ of error for review. This court has recognized and enforced it, and it is not an open-question here that where a judgment below is consented to by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mechanics' & Traders' Bank v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- Mitchell v. TomlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Shealy v. TooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
3Cited by20 opinions
- Seals v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Kollock v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Johnson v. Motor Contract Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- G. M. J. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- BUCKNER-WEBB v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2022
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.