Legal Opinion

J. H. Marshall & Associates, Inc. v. Burleson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1973No. 6159PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YEAGLEY, Associate Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia holding that appellant was engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, permanently enjoining appellant from conducting any further activities of this nature, and dismissing its claim against appellee.1

Appellant raises these contentions:(1) That the Superior Court was without jurisdiction to hear the issue;(2) That proper procedure was not followed in raising the issue; and(3) That appellant was not engaged in the unauthorized practice of law.

The action was begun by appellant, a…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Ex Rel. Virginia State BarSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. People Ex Rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. Peoples Stock Yards State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. GoodmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  5. R.I. Bar Asso. v. Auto. Service Asso.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1935

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Simons v. BellingerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Mendes v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Demetra Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & AssociatCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  4. Paul v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. State Ex Rel. Frieson v. IsnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API