Legal Opinion

Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. Baker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 25, 1992No. 92-1258PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

Before us is a report of the Grievance Commission recommending that attorney William D. Baker be reprimanded.

The commission found that Baker acted unethically in the following ways: aiding the unauthorized practice of law; permitting others to influence his professional judgment in providing legal services to clients referred to him, resulting in conflicts of interest; and accepting improper referrals.

Baker is a sole practitioner and has practiced law in Des Moines since 1967. He focuses primarily on real estate, probate, estate planning, and trusts.

Rex Voegtlin is a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. ConzettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
  2. Bump v. BarnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. LawlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. In Re the Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1968

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. AplandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  2. In Re Mid-America Living Trust Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. KathmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Iowa Supreme Court Commission on Unauthorized Practice of Law v. SturgeonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. Bergantzel v. MlynarikSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API