Legal Opinion

Milton Mende v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 25, 1960No. 16687_1PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

This is a mail fraud case. The first point on appeal concerns, because of statutes of limitations, the effect of bringing in a new indictment which dropped the word “either” and changed one “or” to “and,” plus the substitution of the word “allegations” for the word “violations.”

Mende was one of the principals in an enterprise of - soliciting mail orders for towels and perfume by means of radio advertising. Financially the business was a flop. Radio stations generally didn’t get paid for their broadcast time. Essentially the basis of three successive indictments was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  2. Ilseng v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Arthur J. PorthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. Larry KnohlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. D. Spencer Grow and C. Oran MensikCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,560 United States of America v. David B. CharnayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API