Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dukes v. BROTHERHOOD OF PAINTERS, ETC.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1950PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

235 S.W.2d 7 (1950)

DUKES

v.

BROTHERHOOD OF PAINTERS, DECORATORS & PAPERHANGERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL UNION No. 437, et al.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

December 9, 1950.

T. W. Thomson, Knoxville, for plaintiff in error.

Thurman Ailor, Knoxville, for defendants in error.

BURNETT, Justice.

The plaintiff in error, Dukes, brought this suit against the defendants, the local union, its officers and certain named individuals for having confederated and conspired together to injure him by taking away his means of earning a livelihood and preventing him from obtaining employment.

The original declaration was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fry v. McCord Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Evans v. SwaimSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  3. Order of Railway Conductors v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  4. Barnes v. FortTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Benton v. Knoxville News-Sentinel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Forrester v. StockstillTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Mason v. FunderburkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Harold St. Clair v. Local Union No. 515 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  5. Ladd v. Roane Hosiery, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API