Legal Opinion

Hockett v. Earl

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 7, 1913No. 17,882PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Jewell district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

The principal question upon this appeal is whether a warranty deed made by the plaintiif to defendant Earl was intended as a mortgage or as an *734absolute conveyance. The evidence upon this issue was in sharp conflict. The finding was for. the plaintiff. In this situation the conclusion of the district court is final, unless it should be set aside for erroneous rulings affecting the substantial rights of the defendant.

A jury was called upon request of the plaintiff to make findings upon particular questions of fact. While the jury were being…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kimball v. ConnorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1866
  2. Bethany Hospital Co. v. PhilippiSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. People's Bank of Minneapolis v. ReidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Larkin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. Winston v. BurnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Sutherland v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  3. Cole v. DrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Bell v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Miller v. National Council of the Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API