Stayberg v. Henderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial in an action for damages resulting from an automobile collision. The motion was based upon alleged prejudicial error which is claimed to have resulted from a breakdown in communication between the jury and the trial judge during the jury’s deliberations.
It appears from the record that the jury returned verdicts in favor of defendants as to both plaintiffs. Plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was supported by an affidavit of a member of the jury to the effect that, shortly before 8…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bauer v. Kummer Ex Rel. KummerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Cronquist v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Booth v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Shockman v. Union Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Reilly v. BaderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Hunter v. SmallwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Benson v. RostadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. LandroSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.