Reilly v. Bader
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by the intervenor from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Lochren, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict of $725.08 for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
This action was commenced against the defendant, Bader, to recover on several promissory notes executed by the latter, July 11, 1889, and payable to the plaintiff. The making of the notes was admitted by the defendant, and it was also admitted that the consideration for the notes was the sale of certain personal property by one O’Brien to the defendant. The defendant does not deny his liability on the notes, but puts in issue the plaintiff’s right to recover, showing that Sardeson, who was admitted as an intervening party in the action, as the assignee of O’Brien, also asserted a claim to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hudson v. Minneapolis, Lyndale & Minnetonka Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Burton v. NeillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Stayberg v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Strite Governor Pulley Co. v. LyonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- In re the Probate of the Will of BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.