Legal Opinion

People v. . Doody

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1902PublishedCited by 61 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, entered June 10, 1902, which affirmed a judgment of the Kings County Court rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of perjury. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

O’Brien, J.:

The defendant was convicted of the crime of perjury and the judgment of conviction has been affirmed in the court below after what appears to be a thorough discussion of the questions involved. These questions and the facts1 out of which they arise are so fully set forth in the report of the case below that it is not necessary to repeat the statement here. (72 App. Div. 372.) It will be quite sufficient for every pur pose of a review in this court to refer to the facts1 in a general way.

The charge against the defendant which is set forth, in the indictment is that he was called…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. People v. . FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. The People v. . CourtneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Commonwealth v. GrantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. State v. . KnoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. People v. AshwalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. McGrathNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. StanardNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. People v. SabellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. People v. StanardNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API