Legal Opinion

Cozad State Bank v. McLaughlin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1934No. 29093PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment on a note. The verdict was instructed by the court at the end of evidence on both sides.

*88The note was a demand note for $4,000, made by defendant in favor of plaintiff and dated November 21, 1932. Defendant had first made a like note in favor of plaintiff in October, 1926. About every six months the existing note would be taken up by a renewal signed by defendant and delivered to plaintiff, who was the payee in all of them.

Defendant pleaded that the original note and all renewals, of which the note in suit was the culmination, had been without any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Security Savings Bank v. RhodesNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Farmers National Bank v. OhmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Luikart v. MeierjurgenNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Murphey v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Leach v. TreberNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Leflang v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State Ex Rel. Squire v. FrasierOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Plumbly v. Harvard State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Bachman v. JunkinNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API