Legal Opinion

Bachman v. Junkin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1935No. 29284PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note. In his answer defendant admitted the execution of the note, and, as a defense, pleaded that the note was given without consideration and as an accommodation to the payee thereof. Under this state of the pleadings, the defendant was properly required to first adduce his evidence. At its conclusion and on motion of the plaintiffs, the court discharged the jury and rendered judgment for the plaintiffs. Defendant has appealed.

In his brief for reversal defendant has advanced many •sound propositions of law, buttressed by ample authority, but, as we view…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farmers National Bank v. OhmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Cozad State Bank v. McLaughlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Agnew v. MontgomeryNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Bliss v. VennerNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Morgan v. United Benefit Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walker v. ProbandtNebraska Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API