Legal Opinion

Plumbly v. Harvard State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1937No. 30067PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chappell, District Judge.

Plaintiff, appellant, brought an action against defendant, appellee, in the district court for Clay county, Nebraska, to cancel a promissory note and chattel mortgage and enjoin threatened foreclosure or interference with plaintiff’s use of the mortgaged chattels, alleging want of consideration therefor. A temporary restraining order was granted as prayed and bond furnished as provided by law. Defendant filed answer and cross-petition praying for judgment on the note and foreclosure of the chattel mortgage. Upon trial, the court dissolved the temporary restraining…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CurryNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Cozad State Bank v. McLaughlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Stroud v. PayneNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. KuhnNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Neslund v. KinnanNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Crescent Insulated Wire & Cable Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  2. Leach v. TreberNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Leflang v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API