Legal Opinion

Farmers National Bank v. Ohman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1924No. 22873PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiff alleges, in substance, as a basis of recovery, that it is a corporation, organized and doing business at Pilger, Nebraska, as a national bank; that on the 26th day of April, 1921, the defendants executed and delivered to it their promissory note, in the usual commercial form, for the sum of $7,500, drawing interest at 10 per cent, per annum, due six months after date; that the same was long past due and that no part thereof had been paid, and prayed judgment accordingly.

The defendant L. D. Ohman answered, in substance, alleging, first, a general denial; second, that the note was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. German American State Bank v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Neal v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Skagit State Bank v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Security Savings Bank v. RhodesNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Coffman v. MaloneNebraska Supreme Court · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Central Bank of Bingham v. PerkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cozad State Bank v. McLaughlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Schuett v. HargensNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Department of Banking v. KeeleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Empson v. RichterNebraska Supreme Court · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API