Legal Opinion
United States v. Baldwin
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 18, 2014No. 13-1198PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GORSUCH, Circuit Judge.
Deep in the Code of Federal Regulations, in the part titled “Public Contracts and Property Management,” lie two small provisions that would be easy to overlook were it not for disputes like this one. The first says “[p]ersons in and on [Federal] property must at all times comply ... with the lawful direction of Federal police officers and other authorized individuals.” 41 C.F.R. § 102-74.385. The second adds “[a]ll persons entering in or on Federal property are prohibited from loitering, exhibiting disorderly conduct or exhibiting other conduct on property that ...…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Index Newspapers LLC v. United States Marshals ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Rebecca MorielloCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Galbreath v. The City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. MarotzDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.