United States v. Marotz
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge
William Marotz appeals his conviction of 41 C.F.R. § 102-74.390. For the reasons set forth below, the judgment of conviction is reversed.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The United States charged Defendant William Marotz in an information with one misdemeanor violation of 41 C.F.R. § 102-74.390 (disorderly conduct), based on conduct that occurred on September 10, 2013 at the San Francisco Federal Building. The case was tried to the court on April 4, 2014. At the conclusion of the Government’s case, Marotz moved for .a judgment of acquittal pursuant to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. CassiagnolCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. WasylyshynCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020