Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Beaty

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 2, 1961No. 17838PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

Plaintiff, Caroline Elizabeth Sides Dunlap, seeks in this action a declaratory judgment that a covenant prohibiting the use of a certain 3.67-acre tract of land in the City of Rock Hill as a store or for the conduct of mercantile business is no longer in effect and should be annulled. This covenant is contained in a deed executed by defendant Anna C. Beaty to plaintiff on March 6, 1935. Extinguishment of this restriction is sought upon the grounds (1) that it was not imposed as a part of a general scheme of improvement, and (2) that since the deed was executed, there has been…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Price v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. EDWARDS v. SurrattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. Booker v. Old Dominion Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. Martin v. CANTRELLSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
  5. Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. Lomas and Nettleton Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Palmetto Dunes Resort v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Shipyard Property Owners' Ass'n v. MangiaracinaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  3. McLeod v. BaptisteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Flinkingshelt v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  5. In Re Daufuskie Island Properties, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API