Flinkingshelt v. Johnson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
In this declaratory judgment proceeding plaintiffs-appellants sought to have certain restrictive covenants declared void and of no effect as to certain lots owned by them. The appeal is from a decree denying them any relief, which decree will be reported herewith. We have fully considered such decree, the entire record and the briefs of counsel and conclude that the appellants have failed to demonstrate any prejudicial error. We are also of the view that there was no prejudicial error in the order of the lower court settling the case on appeal.
The judgment of the lower court is, accordingly,
Af…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pitts v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- Martin v. CANTRELLSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- Somerset v. ReynerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
- Dunlap v. BeatySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beatty v. John C. Clark, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1975
- Inabinet v. BooeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
- Abbott v. ArthurSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Menne v. Keowee Key Property Owners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Marathon Finance Co. v. HHC Liquidation Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.