Legal Opinion

Borinstein v. Hansbrough

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1948No. 17,735PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in an action by appellee against appellants to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by appellee as a result of appellants’ alleged negligence in maintaining an “attractive nuisance.”

Issues were joined and the cause submitted to trial by jury which returned its verdict in favor of appellee and against appellants upon the first paragraph of appellee’s third amended complaint in the sum of $14,-000. After a remittitur in the sum of $5,000, the court overruled appellants’ motion for a new trial and rendered judgment upon the verdict, as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. City of Indianapolis v. EmmelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Penso v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Indianapolis Railways, Inc. v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kopczynski Ex Rel. Palmer v. BargersIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Neal, Admr. v. Home Builders, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Neal, Admr. v. Home Builders, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Plotzki v. Standard Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API