Plotzki v. Standard Oil Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION
Emmert, C. J.
Courts, in declaring the common law, of necessity lag behind the collective sentiment and judgment of the people in the establishment of duties, rights and remedies. This delay is desirable from the standpoint of the stability of the law. 1 But when a decision and the reasoning to sustain it retrogresses to the laissez faire philosophy of the Industrial Revolution, an appeal by way of dissent should be made “to the brooding spirit of the law, to the intelligence of a future day.” Hughes, The Supreme Court of the United States (1947 Edition), p. 68.
It will not be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Evansville v. BlueIndiana Supreme Court · 1937
- Anderson v. Reith-Riley Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ChappellIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- Borinstein v. HansbroughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948