Legal Opinion

Demontiney v. United States ex rel. Department of Interior

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 16, 2001No. 99-35874PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judge:

This case arises from a contract dispute among an Indian tribal member, the tribe, and a federal agency over a construction project on tribal land. The issues before us are jurisdictional. Appellant, Chippewa Cree tribal member John Demontiney (“Demontiney”), doing business as Earth-walker Engineering, entered into a subcontract with Appellee, the Chippewa Cree Tribe of Rocky Boy’s Reservation (the “Tribe”), for engineering sendees to remodel the Bonneau Dam located on tribal land in Montana. Demontiney sued the Tribe and Appellee, the United States of America,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Rmi Titanium Company v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Newtok Village v. Andy PatrickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Daniel Miller v. Chad WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Bodi v. Shingle Springs Band of Miwok IndiansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Sanchez v. Santa Ana Golf Club, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API