Legal Opinion

Daniel Miller v. Chad Wright

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 13, 2012No. 11-35850PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Appellees’ Request for Reconsideration and Correction of Footnote 4, filed on November 26, 2012, is construed as a Petition for Panel Rehearing. So construed, the petition is GRANTED. The opinion in this case, filed on November 13, 2012, is AMENDED to delete footnote 4, Slip Opinion, p. 13246.

No further petitions for rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be entertained.

OPINION

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:

This is the latest iteration of cigarette vendors’ challenge to taxes imposed by virtue of the authority vested in an Indian tribe. Appellants Daniel T. Miller (Miller), Amber…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. AE Ex Rel. Hernandez v. County of TulareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Sanders v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Rahne Pistor v. Carlos GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Timothy White v. University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. State of Arizona v. Tohono O'Odham NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Acres Bonusing, Inc v. Lester MarstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. Bodi v. Shingle Springs Band of Miwok IndiansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API