Legal Opinion

Wicklund v. Salvagni

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 16, 1996No. 95-36028PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

The issue in this case is whether a Montana statute that requires that minors notify a parent before obtaining an abortion is constitutional. The statute provides for a form of “judicial bypass” of its parental notification provision for certain minors. Plaintiffs filed an action in district court contending that the notification statute was unconstitutional because the bypass was inadequate. The district court found the statute unconstitutional. On appeal the parties explore a number of difficult issues. We do not reach them because we conclude that we are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lambert v. WicklundSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. NeelyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1996
  3. 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6122, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,021 Susan Wicklund, M.D. James H. Armstrong, M.D. Lindsay Richards, M.D., Susan Cahill, P.A. Douglas Webber, M.D. Beth E. Thompson, M.D. Mary Stranahan, D.O. And Mark Miles, M.D., on Behalf of Themselves and Their Patients Throughout Montana, and Surrounding States and Canada v. Michael SalvagniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Lambert v. WicklundSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API