Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. Neely
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
MARQUEZ, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs originally filed this action on August 29, 1989 to enjoin the Defendants from enforcing the prior version of AR.S. § 36-2152, which required minor women to obtain parental consent prior to an abortion and imposed criminal penalties on physicians violating the statute. By Order dated September 14, 1992, this Court found that language dealing with “Medical Procedure with Respect to an Abortion” was unconstitutionally vague and further determined that the Statute’s medical emergency applied only in life-threatening cases…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. LawallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona, Inc. v. WoodsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1997
- Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. NeelyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. LawallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Planned Parenthood of Southern Arizona v. NeelyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.