Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Wicklund

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 31, 1997No. 96-858PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Per curiam

Before a minor has an abortion in Montana, one of her parents must be notified. A waiver, or “judicial bypass,” of the notification requirement is allowed if the minor can convince a court that notification would not be in her best interests. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit struck down Montana’s parental notification law as unconstitutional, holding that the judicial bypass did not sufficiently protect the right of minors to have an abortion. Because the Ninth Circuit’s holding is in direct conflict with our precedents, we grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and reverse.

In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Hodgson v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Eugene Glick, M.D., and Planned Parenthood of Washoe County v. Brian McKay Attorney General of the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Wicklund v. SalvagniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New Eng.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Jones v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  3. American Academy of Pediatrics v. LungrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Planned Parenthood of Idaho, Inc. v. WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Anspach v. City of Philadelphia, Department of Public HealthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API