Lambert v. Wicklund
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
Before a minor has an abortion in Montana, one of her parents must be notified. A waiver, or “judicial bypass,” of the notification requirement is allowed if the minor can convince a court that notification would not be in her best interests. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit struck down Montana’s parental notification law as unconstitutional, holding that the judicial bypass did not sufficiently protect the right of minors to have an abortion. Because the Ninth Circuit’s holding is in direct conflict with our precedents, we grant the petition for a writ of certiorari and reverse.
In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive HealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hodgson v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Eugene Glick, M.D., and Planned Parenthood of Washoe County v. Brian McKay Attorney General of the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Wicklund v. SalvagniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
3Cited by84 opinions
- Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New Eng.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Jones v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- American Academy of Pediatrics v. LungrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Planned Parenthood of Idaho, Inc. v. WasdenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Anspach v. City of Philadelphia, Department of Public HealthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.