Legal Opinion
RIVENS
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2011No. ID 3731PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
25 I&N Dec. 623
(BIA 2011) Interim Decision #3731 Matter of Benno RIVENS, Respondent Decided October 19, 2011 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) In order to establish that a returning lawful permanent resident alien is to be treated as an applicant for admission to the United States, the Department of Homeland Security has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that one of the six exceptions to the general rule for lawful permanent residents set forth at section 101(a)(13)(C) of the Immigration and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- SILVA-TREVINOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2015
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Robles-Urrea v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Gonzaga-Ortega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Patel v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Rogelio Vazquez Romero v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Mendez v. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.