Legal Opinion

Sunset Oil Co. v. Marshall Oil Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1940No. L. A. No. 17487PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The defendant, Marshall Oil Company, appealed from a judgment in an action to quiet title to real property. The plaintiff moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the corporate powers of the defendant had been suspended in 1922 by the forfeiture of its charter for non-payment of the corporate license tax, and that it had no power to prosecute an appeal under the powers reserved to it by the statute. The plaintiff presents a certificate of the Secretary of State showing that the defendant had, on March 4, 1922, forfeited its charter for non-payment of its license tax pursuant to the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boyle v. Lakeview Creamery Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Kaiser Land and Fruit Co. v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peacock Hill Ass'n v. Peacock Lagoon Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Peacock Hill Ass'n v. Peacock Lagoon Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API