United States v. Soltero
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam Opinion; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge HAWKINS.
ORDER
The Per Curiam Opinion filed on October 19, 2007, 506 F.3d 718 (9th Cir.2007), is amended as follows:
At slip op. 14109, 506 F.3d at 724, the following is deleted (first paragraph and footnote 8):
We agree. While it is possible that “Soltero” is the defendant’s “true legal name” (as the government contends), 8/we see no reason for the supervised release condition to remain ambiguous when it could be so easily clarified. The government does not object to defendant’s use of the surname “Soltero” during his period of…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Robert BolingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Ray Donald LoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Matthew Eugene DupasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Timothy Wolf ChildCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Anthony EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Pabon, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.