Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Thompson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 19, 1990No. 88-1936-D-3; CA A61187PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Husband appeals from a dissolution judgment. He claims that the trial court erred in awarding custody of the parties’ child to wife, in evaluating his retirement accounts as of the date of trial and in awarding certain personal property and support to wife. On de novo review, we affirm.

Husband, 38, is an attorney. Wife, 31, is a legal secretary. They were married in 1982 and had a child in December, 1986. Wife stayed home with the child until he was 18 months' old. During that time, husband was working about 12 hours a day, and wife did most of the caretaking of the child. In May, 1988, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of SticeOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Matter of Marriage of RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Matter of Marriage of Olinger and OlingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. In re the Marriage of Van DykeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. In the Matter of Marriage of Crislip and CrislipCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nickerson v. NickersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  2. In re the Marriage of KampmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Matter of Marriage of FollansbeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Owens-Koenig v. KoenigCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. In re Marriage of CooteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API