Legal Opinion
Beer v. Beer
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 19, 1935PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By LEMERT, J.
As to the first alleged ground of error we have to say that this motion was predicated upon' the theory that plaintiff was a guest passenger in defendant’s, automobile, that if she wished to recover she must recover under the so-called Guest Statute of Ohio as set forth in §6308-6, GC,- which reads as follows:
“The owner, operator or person responsible for the operation of a motor vehicle shall not be liable for loss or damage arising from injuries to, or death of, a guest-while being transported without payment therefor in or upon said motor vehicle resulting from the…
2Cited by16 opinions
- McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Albrecht v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Smith v. CluteNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Kerstetter v. ElfmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Myers v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.