Crasto v. Estate of Kaskel
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, in these related class actions under the New York state and federal securities daws, move, pursuant to Rule 23(c)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P., and Rule llA(e) of this court, for class action determination.
The underlying facts in these controversies may be found in our earlier decisions of motions in these cases, dated December 12, 19731 and January 22, 1974, and in the opinion of the New York Court of Appeals in Richards v. Kaskel, 32 N.Y.2d 524, 347 N.Y.S.2d 1, 300 N.E.2d 388 (1973). We will therefore, discuss here only those facts relevant to this motion.
Plai…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Moscarelli v. StammDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Simon v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Buford v. American Finance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Elsie Simer v. Richard J. Rios, Acting Director of Community Services Administration Community Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Zimmerman v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
- Haley v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1996
- Anixter v. Home-Stake Production Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- Anne Arundel County v. Halle Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.